I get this a lot. “You don’t look autistic.” It’s meant as a compliment, I think. Like I’ve done a good job of hiding it. Gold star for passing. Or it’s a remark that implies I don’t have autism because I don’t visibly struggle.
You know, like you can’t have COVID if you don’t get tested. Or you don’t look like you have cancer—is that one?
What I want to ask—but don’t, because that would be rude and I’ve learned not to be rude in ways that upset people—is: what does autistic look like?
What they expect
Based on the reactions I get, autistic apparently looks like:
- A white male child (I am two of these things, unfortunately);
- Obsessed with trains or math;
- Unable to make eye contact ever, under any circumstances;
- Completely incapable of sarcasm;
- Some degree of intellectual disability;
- Rain Man, basically (also a Minnesotan) (I am one of those things)
Here’s the thing: I am obsessed with trains. I will go out of my way to get stopped at a railroad crossing. I love algebra. So the stereotypes aren’t entirely wrong—they’re just incomplete. Matching a few boxes doesn’t mean you match all of them, and not matching the visible ones doesn’t mean you’re not autistic.
The eye contact thing is partially true. I can do it in short painful bursts when I force myself. The rest of the time I’m looking for spaceships—staring past people, through them, at something over their shoulder, maybe up in the air. It’s not that I can’t make eye contact. It’s that it costs something every time I do; it’s manual labor.
I can use sarcasm. But my voice is flat. My tone—if I’m not consciously thinking about it—doesn’t shift the way it’s supposed to. So I’ll say something sarcastic and people take it literally, and then I have to explain that it was a joke, and nothing kills a joke faster than having to explain it was a joke.
How we got here
The image of autism in most people’s heads didn’t come from nowhere. It was constructed, historically, by who got studied and who got diagnosed.
In the 1940s, Leo Kanner published his observations of children with what he called “early infantile autism.” The children he studied were, by and large, the ones who couldn’t hide it—kids with obvious social differences, limited speech, visible distress. Kanner’s work became the foundation for how autism was understood for decades: a severe childhood condition, unmistakable, tragic.
Around the same time, Hans Asperger was studying a different group of kids in Vienna—children who were socially odd but highly verbal, often with intense intellectual interests. His work was in German, during World War II, and it didn’t make it into the English-speaking medical mainstream until the 1980s. For forty years, the only autism that existed in the diagnostic manuals was Kanner’s version. The visible kind. The kind you couldn’t miss.
This is why “you don’t look autistic” is even a sentence. And fuck I hate that it is. The diagnosis was built around people who couldn’t mask, couldn’t pass, couldn’t perform normalcy. Everyone else—those who learned to fake it, who white-knuckled their way through social situations, who figured out the rules through painful trial and error—didn’t count. They weren’t autistic. They were just weird, or difficult, or anxious, or “quirky.”
The DSM didn’t merge Asperger’s syndrome into the autism spectrum until 2013 with its release of the DSM-5. That’s not ancient history. That’s recent. A whole generation of autistic people grew up being told they weren’t autistic because they didn’t match a profile designed around the most visible cases. Or they had “Asperger’s” because they didn’t fit the prototypical profile, as defined in the DSM-IV-TR from 2000.
Steve Silberman’s NeuroTribes traces this history in detail—how autism was defined, redefined, narrowed, and eventually expanded. The short version: what “looks autistic” is an artifact of diagnostic criteria that excluded most autistic people for most of the diagnosis’s existence. The image in your head is a historical accident, not a medical reality.
The misdiagnosis pipeline
When you don’t “look autistic,” it’s incredibly difficult to get diagnosed with autism. You get diagnosed with everything else instead.
Depression. Anxiety. Bipolar disorder. Borderline personality disorder if you’re seriously unlucky. OCD. ADHD. Eating disorders. Social anxiety disorder. Sometimes several of these at once, stacked on top of each other like a diagnostic Jenga tower that never quite stabilizes.
My social uncertainty was an issue solvable by SSRIs and SNRIs. My unwillingness to go outside, my saying-dumb-things disorder was chalked up to anxiety and an impulse disorder.
Some of these aren’t exactly wrong. Autistic people often do have depression and anxiety—usually because existing in a world that doesn’t fit your brain is depressing and anxiety-inducing. But they’re downstream diagnoses. They’re treating symptoms while missing the cause.
One of the problems with autistic people with low-support needs is that the script to pass—call it an acceptance test, since this is a technical blog sometimes—is rehearsed over and over. Short of a complete biography, short of seeing an autistic person with low-support needs in the wild, it’s hard to understand the problems faced because the mask can be worn.
If you’re a female with autism, doubly-so. You are (usually) explicitly taught manners, how to be polite, and there are scripts associated with it, installed at a young age.
Here’s the thing about prevalence: autism occurs at roughly the same rate across sexes, races, and cultures. The CDC estimates 1 in 31 children in the US; the WHO says 1 in 100 globally. The variation you see across countries—California at 3.9%, France at 0.36%—isn’t biological. It’s access. It’s awareness. It’s whether your culture even has a framework for recognizing autism in the first place.
The famous 4:1 male-to-female ratio? That’s another diagnostic artifact, not a biological reality. When researchers adjust how they evaluate participants, the ratio drops. One study brought it from 4.2 to 3.3 just by changing evaluation methods. A Danish study tracked diagnoses over time and watched the ratio fall from 8:1 in 1995 to 3:1 within fifteen years. The gap is closing not because more women are becoming autistic, but because we’re finally getting better at recognizing autism that doesn’t look like a white boy who likes trains.
Same pattern with race and ethnicity. In the US, autism prevalence is now similar across racial groups—and in some data, higher among Asian, Hispanic, and Black children than white children. This isn’t because autism suddenly became more common in minority communities or PFAs. It’s because outreach, screening, and destigmatization finally reached them. The autism was always there. The diagnoses weren’t.
What I’m trying to say is that the little girl in the tribe that hasn’t been contacted by civilization is just as likely to have autism as the girl next to the 3M factory in Maplewood, Minnesota.
Unmasking Autism talks about this extensively. The average age of autism diagnosis for people who can mask is years or decades later than for those who can’t. Women get diagnosed later than men, on average, because the diagnostic criteria were built around how autism presents in boys. People of color get diagnosed later or not at all, because the research was conducted almost entirely on white kids.
If you’re good at masking—if you’ve learned to perform normalcy well enough that clinicians don’t see the autism—you get funneled into the wrong diagnostic categories. You spend years on medications that don’t quite work, in therapy that helps but doesn’t address the underlying thing, wondering why you’re still struggling when you’re doing everything right.
Quick note on therapy: autistic people often can’t identify what they struggle with, so they don’t bring it up. If a therapist asks specific questions, they can get into detail. But until someone probes, what’s normal for the autistic person will be treated as normal—not flagged as a sign of something else.
I collected diagnoses for years before anyone said the word “autism.” Each one explained just part of the picture. None of them explained all of it. It wasn’t until I read about autism in adults—specifically adults who’d learned to mask—that everything clicked into place.
The “you don’t look autistic” thing isn’t just fucking annoying. It’s a diagnostic barrier. It’s the reason people spend decades thinking they’re broken in fifteen different ways instead of understanding they’re autistic in one.
And the stakes are high. Autistic people are significantly more likely to die by suicide than the general population—some studies suggest nine times more likely than their neurotypical peers. Suicidal ideation is even more common. The numbers are so much worse for late-diagnosed adults, for women, for anyone who spent years masking without knowing why they had to.
The stress of adulthood builds up. A 2023 meta-analysis found that 34% of autistic adults without intellectual disability experience suicidal ideation, and 24% have attempted suicide. 72% surpass clinical thresholds for suicide risk. These aren’t people with visible, profound autism who might receive support and accommodation. These are the ones who mask, who pass, who look fine. The camouflaging itself is a risk factor—research shows it independently predicts suicidal thoughts even after controlling for depression and anxiety. You spend decades performing normalcy, burning through energy you don’t have, and the debt compounds. Depression hits autistic people at four times the general rate. Anxiety affects 50% of autistic adults. Late diagnosis correlates with higher suicidality. The pattern is clear: the longer you go without knowing why you’re struggling, the worse it gets.
This isn’t an abstract statistic to me. I’ve been in dark places. The kind where you’re not sure you want to keep doing this, whatever “this” is. Knowing I was autistic didn’t fix everything, but it gave me a framework. It turned “I’m fundamentally broken” into “I’m running different software in a world designed for a different operating system.” That reframe matters. It’s the difference between hating yourself and understanding yourself.
When someone doesn’t “look autistic” and doesn’t get diagnosed, they don’t get that framework. They just get the self-hatred. And sometimes that’s fatal.
The retardation thing
Let’s just say it: when most people hear “autistic,” they picture someone with an intellectual disability. The image in their head is someone who can’t live independently, can’t hold a job, can’t have a conversation.
Autism and intellectual disability are different things. They can overlap, but they usually don’t. The majority of autistic people have average or above-average intelligence. The struggles are social, sensory, and communicative—not cognitive.
But the conflation persists, partly because of that same history. The autistic people who got studied, diagnosed, and institutionalized were often the ones with co-occurring intellectual disabilities. They were the most visible. The ones who could pass—who could mask, who could perform—didn’t end up in the studies. So the studies said autism looked like intellectual disability, because those were the only autistic people anyone was counting.
This is why “you don’t look autistic” lands weird. It’s not really about looking autistic. It’s about not looking intellectually disabled. Which I’m not. And neither are most autistic people. But thanks for the accidental insult wrapped in a compliment.
“We’re all a little autistic”
This one makes me want to walk into the sea.
When I tell someone I’m autistic, sometimes they respond with: “Oh, I think everyone’s a little autistic. I’m so OCD about my desk!” Or: “I get overwhelmed at parties too, we’re all on the spectrum somewhere.”
No. No, we’re not.
Everyone has moments of social awkwardness. Everyone gets overwhelmed sometimes. Everyone has preferences and habits. That’s not autism. That’s being a person.
Autism is not a personality quirk dialed up to eleven. It’s a fundamentally different way of processing the world—sensory input, social information, language, emotion, all of it. Saying “we’re all a little autistic” because you like your desk organized is like saying “we’re all a little paraplegic” because your legs get tired.
The comment is meant to be sympathetic, I think. It’s an attempt to relate, to find common ground. But what it actually does is minimize. It says: your struggles aren’t real, because everyone has them. It flattens a neurological difference into a relatable quirk. It erases the actual experience of being autistic by pretending everyone shares it.
You’re not a little autistic. You’re just a person who sometimes feels awkward. Those are different things. One of them comes with a lifetime of not fitting in, of exhausting yourself to appear normal, of being misunderstood in ways that are hard to explain to people who’ve never experienced it. The other one is called “being human.”
If you want to relate, just say “that sounds hard” and move on. “What’s really hard for you?” if you really want to brighten an autist’s day. Don’t claim membership in a club you’re not in.
What autistic actually looks like, in my case
- Listening to the same three artists on repeat for more than a decade (Purity Ring, Nero, and Flume, if you’re wondering);
- Eating the same breakfast, because it works and change is bad;
- Owning nine of the exact same shirt and NOT because Steve Jobs also wore the same shirt;
- Having to leave social events early because my brain is full;
- Reading a room wrong and not realizing until months later, or sometimes never;
- Scripting conversations in advance so I don’t say something weird, and by in advance I mean for a month;
- Saying something weird anyway always;
- Having to consciously remember to ask people questions about themselves and do so without sounding like a robot, as if it’s natural to not sound like a robot;
- Getting overwhelmed by sounds that other people apparently don’t notice, like the hum of a refrigerator or someone existing near me;
- Struggling to identify what I’m feeling until it becomes a huge problem, including needing to bathroom or eat or drink some water;
- Taking things literally and then being surprised when that wasn’t the point, oh;
- Waiting for trains at railroad crossings on purpose, because trains
None of this looks like anything from the outside. You’d just see a guy eating eggs, wearing a slim black shirt, leaving a party early because he’s hot and with some babe, parked at a railroad crossing watching freight cars go by. Normal enough. Quirky at worst.
Here’s what people miss: I’m not effortlessly normal. I’m performing normal, constantly, and the performance is exhausting.
Every social interaction has a script I’m running in the background. What’s my face doing. Is this the appropriate amount of eye contact? Did I let them finish talking? (Narrator: no.) Should I laugh now, was that a joke or serious? Ope, too late, I already responded wrong.
Neurotypical people—as far as I can tell—don’t have to think about this. It just happens for them. For me, it’s manual. Every time.
Devon Price’s Unmasking Autism describes this performance as “masking“—the process of suppressing autistic traits and mimicking neurotypical behavior to fit in. Most autistic people do it. Many don’t even realize they’re doing it until they burn out.
The “you don’t look autistic” comment is actually evidence of the autism. We fucking did it! I don’t look autistic because I’ve spent decades learning how to not look autistic. That’s the whole thing. You’re not observing the absence of autism. You’re observing the presence of a very expensive coping mechanism.
The cost of masking
Masking isn’t free. It’s a loan against your future self, and the interest rate is brutal.
The energy it takes to perform normalcy all day—monitoring your face in real-time as if it’s a fucking websocket, modulating your voice, suppressing stims, forcing eye contact, following social scripts—that energy has to come from somewhere. And it comes from the reserves you’d otherwise use for, you know, living.
Autistic burnout is a real thing. It’s not regular burnout, the kind where you’re tired from working too hard. It’s a specific kind of collapse that comes from sustained masking. Your ability to function just degrades like toilet paper. Skills you had disappear. Sensory sensitivities get worse. The mask slips, or cracks, or falls off entirely because you don’t have the energy to hold it up anymore.
There have been many periods where I couldn’t make myself do basic things, including shower or get out of bed. And no, it wasn’t depression. There have been instances where social interaction became impossible, not just difficult; I couldn’t hear what the person was saying and I couldn’t tell them because I couldn’t use words. There have been times where the performance I’d been maintaining for years just stopped being sustainable. It’s not laziness, though it can look like it. It’s not anxiety. It’s the bill coming due for decades of pretending to be someone you’re not.
The worst part is that the people around you don’t understand what’s happening because you don’t even have the words to identify what you’re feeling in the first place. You were fine before! You were high-functioning. What changed? Nothing changed—you just ran out of the energy to keep faking it. But try explaining that to someone who never knew you were faking in the first place.
Late diagnosis
I wasn’t diagnosed until 2022. This is common for people who can mask well enough to get by—especially if you’re not a white boy who fits the Kanner profile.
Getting diagnosed late is a strange experience. On one hand, relief. There’s a name for this. There’s a reason I’ve always felt like I was running different software than everyone else. I’m not broken—or at least, not broken in the way I thought. The struggles make sense now. The failures make sense. The constant low-grade exhaustion of existing in a world that wasn’t built for my brain: it has a name.
On the other hand, grief. How much easier would things have been if I’d known earlier? How many situations did I misread, how many relationships did I fumble, how many opportunities did I miss because I didn’t have the framework to understand what was happening? How much of my life was spent masking without knowing I was masking, burning energy on a performance I didn’t know I was giving?
You start recontextualizing everything. That time you got fired for being “difficult”—maybe you were just direct in a way that neurotypical people read as rude. That relationship that ended because you “didn’t care enough”—maybe you cared a lot and just didn’t express it in the expected ways. That period of burnout you thought was depression—maybe it was autistic burnout and nobody knew, including you.
Reading Unmasking Autism while already knowing I was autistic felt like someone narrating my life. Reading A Little Less Broken felt like permission to stop pretending the hard parts weren’t hard.
The reveal
Telling someone you’re autistic after they’ve known you for a while produces interesting results.
Some people become instant experts. They’ve read an article, or they watched a documentary once, or their cousin’s kid is autistic, and suddenly they’re pouring out everything they know about autism as if I haven’t been living it for decades. They explain my own condition to me. I nod along. It’s easier than correcting them, and takes less energy, and I’ll look less like an asshole.
Some people start listing every person they think might be autistic. Their coworker who’s “a little weird.” Their uncle who “just doesn’t get social cues.” Their ex who was “probably on the spectrum.” They’re building a mental roster and they want me to know they’ve been paying attention. What they don’t do is offer to introduce me to their hot friend. Apparently being autistic makes me safe to talk to but not safe to set up.
Most people don’t treat me differently at all. Nothing changes. This is fine. Ideal, even. I didn’t tell you so you’d act different. I told you so you’d have context for when I inevitably do something that doesn’t make sense to you.
The best reactions are something like: “Oh, cool. That explains why you’re an asshole sometimes. Not that you’re an asshole.” Acknowledgment without drama. An update to their mental model of me without a whole recalibration. Yeah, sometimes I’m blunt, or I miss something obvious, or I bail on plans because I’m overstimulated. Now you know why. Moving on.
Another great reaction is “let me know what I can do to make your life easier.”
The spectrum thing
When people hear “autism spectrum,” they picture a line. On one end: not autistic. On the other end: very autistic. And everyone with autism is somewhere on that line, with “high-functioning” people closer to the normal end and “low-functioning” people closer to the severe end.
This is wrong. That’s not how the spectrum works.
The spectrum isn’t a line from “a little autistic” to “very autistic.” It’s more like a radar chart, or a color wheel, or one of those D&D character stat sheets. There are multiple dimensions—social communication, sensory processing, repetitive behaviors, executive function, emotional regulation, and more—and each one varies independently.
You can be “high” in one area and “low” in another. You can struggle massively with sensory input and have relatively few issues with verbal communication. You can be great at pattern recognition and terrible at reading faces. You can hold down a demanding job and be completely unable to make a phone call.
When someone says they’re “on the spectrum,” they’re not telling you where they fall on a line from normal to weird. They’re telling you they have a particular constellation of traits that varies across multiple axes. Two autistic people can have almost nothing in common in terms of which specific things they struggle with. One might need noise-canceling headphones everywhere; another might not have sensory issues at all but can’t parse sarcasm to save their life.
This is why “you don’t look autistic” is so absurd. There’s no single way to look autistic because there’s no single way to be autistic. The spectrum isn’t a gradient from neurotypical to Rain Man. It’s a multidimensional space, and every autistic person occupies a different point in that space.
The linear interpretation is also where “we’re all a little autistic” comes from. If autism is a line and everyone’s somewhere on it, then sure, maybe you’re just a few notches toward the autistic end. But that’s not the model. The model is: either your brain processes the world in this fundamentally different way, or it doesn’t. And if it does, the specific ways it manifests vary wildly from person to person.
So no, you’re not “a little autistic” because you like routines. You’re just a person who likes routines. I’m autistic because my brain operates on different architecture entirely—and the specifics of that architecture are mine, not a point on a line you can also claim to be on.
“High-functioning”
I hate this term. Not in a vague political way. I hate it because it’s wrong and it does damage.
“High-functioning” means I can hold a job and pay rent and have conversations without people noticing something is off. From the outside, I function. Great. But here’s what “high-functioning” actually means in practice: your struggles are invisible, so they must not be real.
It means people expect you to be fine all the time, because you’re usually fine. It means when you’re not fine, there’s no framework for it. You were high-functioning yesterday. Why aren’t you high-functioning now? What changed?
Nothing changed. The functioning is inconsistent. It was always inconsistent. You just didn’t see the low-functioning days because I hid or canceled plans or powered through at great personal cost.
The label also implies a binary: high or low. Capable or incapable. But functioning isn’t a single axis. I’m high-functioning at my job. I’m low-functioning at returning phone calls. I’m medium-functioning at keeping friendships alive. I’m completely non-functioning at anything involving the DMV or health insurance or calling to make an appointment.
What looks like high-functioning from the outside is often just well-hidden low-functioning. The performance is good enough that people don’t see the effort. And because they don’t see the effort, they assume there isn’t any. And because they assume there isn’t any, they don’t understand when I hit a wall.
“High-functioning autistic” often just means “autistic person whose struggles are easy to ignore.”
Why this matters
I’m not writing this to complain, exactly. Or to educate, though maybe it does that too. I’m writing it because the image of autism in most people’s heads is wrong, and the wrongness has consequences.
When autism only “looks like” the severe, visible version, everyone else gets erased. They don’t get diagnosed. They don’t get support. They spend years or decades thinking something is wrong with them—that they’re broken, or lazy, or just bad at being a person—because nobody told them there was a word for their experience.
When autism only “looks like” intellectual disability, autistic people with normal or high intelligence get dismissed. Their struggles aren’t real because they’re too smart to be autistic. They should be able to just try harder. The mask becomes mandatory because nobody believes them when they take it off.
When “we’re all a little autistic,” the actual autistic experience gets flattened into a quirk. The real challenges disappear into a fog of relatability. Everyone’s a little autistic, so no one is, so what are you even complaining about?
I don’t need people to understand autism completely. I just need them to understand that their mental image is probably incomplete. That the quiet coworker might be masking. That the friend who cancels plans might be burnt out, not flaky. That “you don’t look autistic” isn’t the compliment they think it is.
You’re right, actually
Fine. I don’t look autistic. But also: maybe you don’t know what autistic looks like.
It looks like your coworker who always eats alone and you assume just prefers it that way. It looks like your friend who cancels plans last minute and you think is flaky. It looks like the person who interrupts a lot and you find annoying. It looks like the guy who takes jokes seriously and you think has no sense of humor. It looks like the woman who doesn’t notice you’re upset until you explicitly say so.
It looks like a lot of people you’ve already met and already judged, because they didn’t match the image in your head.
I don’t look autistic. Neither do most autistic people. That’s sort of the point.
]]>
